CointabCointab
Product
Solutions
Popular reconciliations
PricingResources
Schedule guided setupLogin
Start free

Popular reconciliation template

Loan Repayment vs Payment Gateway Reconciliation

Reconcile loan repayment records with payment gateway transactions to match EMI payments, borrower collections, successful payments, failed payments, refunds, reversals, gateway fees, settlements, and open items in one structured workflow.

Upload the required loan repayment and payment gateway reports, select the period, run reconciliation, and review fully matched, partially matched, unmatched, and skipped records.

Start this reconciliationSchedule guided setup
View demo report

Ready-made workflow · Reusable every period · Manual upload or automated data flow

Loan Repayment / Collection Report
Payment Gateway Transaction Report
Refund / Failed Payment / Reversal Data
Settlement / Fee / Bank Data

Cointab Loan Repayment-Payment Gateway Reconciliation

MatchedPartially MatchedUnmatchedSkipped

Reconcile loan repayments with payment gateway transactions

Loan repayment records and payment gateway reports often show the same borrower payment activity with different references, statuses, timestamps, settlement values, fees, refunds, and failed payment details. Cointab helps bring these differences into a clear reconciliation report.

The Loan Repayment vs Payment Gateway Reconciliation template helps lending, fintech, NBFC, banking, and finance teams compare borrower repayment records with payment gateway transaction reports.

This helps teams answer questions such as:

  • Which borrower repayments were successfully processed by the payment gateway?
  • Which successful payment gateway transactions are missing from the loan repayment system?
  • Which loan repayment records do not have matching payment gateway transactions?
  • Which EMI payments were failed, pending, reversed, refunded, duplicated, or retried?
  • Which borrower payments were received through the gateway but not updated in the loan system?
  • Which repayment records are marked paid internally but failed or pending in the payment gateway?
  • Which gateway fees, taxes, refunds, chargebacks, or settlement deductions explain the difference?
  • Which items need payment gateway follow-up, loan system correction, borrower follow-up, finance review, or internal approval?

This template is useful for NBFCs, fintech lenders, digital lending platforms, banks, microfinance companies, loan aggregators, collection teams, finance teams, controllers, CFOs, and accounting firms that need a repeatable loan repayment-to-payment-gateway reconciliation process.

Required files for this template

Cointab's ready-made workflow is designed around common loan repayment reports, payment gateway transaction reports, settlement reports, failed payment files, refund reports, borrower master files, bank statements, ERP exports, and supporting files used for lending reconciliation.

Data sourceExample records
Loan Repayment / Collection ReportUsed as the internal source-of-truth report containing loan IDs, borrower IDs, repayment IDs, EMI IDs, due dates, collection dates, collection amounts, principal, interest, penalties, charges, repayment status, and collection mode.
Payment Gateway Transaction ReportUsed as the gateway-side report containing payment IDs, order IDs, transaction IDs, gateway references, payment status, payment dates, payment methods, transaction amounts, and gateway response details.
Payment Gateway Settlement ReportOptional, but useful where gateway transactions need to be linked with settlement batches, settlement dates, settlement UTRs, net settlement amounts, gateway fees, taxes, chargebacks, and bank transfer references.
Failed Payment ReportOptional, but useful where borrower payment attempts fail because of bank rejection, insufficient funds, card failure, UPI failure, expired mandate, gateway timeout, authentication failure, customer cancellation, or technical failure.
Refund / Reversal ReportOptional, but useful where duplicate repayments, borrower refunds, reversed transactions, failed refunds, cancelled payments, or payment corrections need to be reconciled.
Borrower Master FileOptional, but useful where borrower IDs, customer IDs, loan account numbers, borrower names, branch details, product details, repayment method, and loan status need to be mapped.
EMI Schedule ReportOptional, but useful where repayment records need to be compared with scheduled EMI amounts, principal, interest, penalties, due dates, overdue status, and expected collection amounts.
Bank StatementOptional, but useful if the finance team also wants to compare payment gateway settlements with actual bank statement credits.
LMS / Loan Management System ExportOptional, but useful where repayment status, borrower ledger, EMI schedule, overdue amount, loan status, and accounting status are maintained in a loan management system.
ERP / Accounting ExportOptional, but useful if repayment, borrower receivable, interest income, penalties, charges, gateway fees, settlements, refunds, reversals, or accounting records are maintained in SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics, Tally, Zoho Books, QuickBooks, or another accounting system.
Supporting DataOptional supporting files can be used for loan mapping, borrower mapping, repayment reference mapping, payment gateway mapping, settlement mapping, bank account mapping, branch mapping, product mapping, GL mapping, entity mapping, or other enrichment.

What Cointab matches in loan repayment and payment gateway reconciliation

Cointab compares loan repayment records with payment gateway transactions across EMI collections, borrower payments, payment IDs, order IDs, failed payments, refunds, gateway fees, settlements, and optional bank or accounting records.

Loan repayments and gateway payments

Match borrower repayment records with successful payment gateway transactions.

Loan and borrower references

Compare loan IDs, loan account numbers, borrower IDs, customer IDs, repayment IDs, EMI IDs, order IDs, payment IDs, transaction IDs, and gateway references.

Payment status

Compare paid, successful, failed, pending, cancelled, reversed, refunded, chargeback, and retried payment statuses across internal and gateway reports.

Repayment amounts

Compare scheduled EMI amount, collected amount, principal amount, interest amount, penalty amount, charge amount, gateway transaction amount, refund amount, reversal amount, and net received amount.

Gateway fees and deductions

Compare gateway fees, convenience fees, processing charges, taxes, service charges, settlement deductions, and net settlement amounts where available.

Refunds and reversals

Match refunds, failed refunds, duplicate payment reversals, borrower refunds, gateway reversals, and internal correction records.

Settlement records

If settlement files are included, compare successful gateway transactions with settlement batches, payout dates, settlement UTRs, net settlement amounts, and bank credits.

EMI and schedule records

If EMI schedule data is included, check whether collections match expected due amount, principal, interest, penalties, and overdue position.

Internal records, if added

If LMS, bank, ERP, accounting, NACH, borrower master, or collection partner data is included, Cointab can connect loan repayment-payment gateway reconciliation with wider lending finance workflows.

Common loan repayment and payment gateway reconciliation exceptions

Cointab helps lending and finance teams focus on repayment-payment gateway differences instead of manually reviewing every borrower payment, EMI, gateway transaction, failed attempt, refund, and settlement record.

Repayment not found in payment gateway

A repayment is recorded or marked paid internally, but no matching payment gateway transaction is found.

Gateway payment not found in repayment records

A successful payment gateway transaction appears without a matching loan repayment record.

Repayment marked paid but gateway failed

A repayment is shown as paid in the loan system, but the payment gateway shows failed, pending, cancelled, or reversed status.

Gateway successful but repayment not updated

A gateway transaction is successful, but the loan system still shows the EMI or repayment as unpaid, overdue, pending, or partially paid.

Amount mismatch

The loan ID, borrower ID, payment ID, order ID, transaction ID, or gateway reference appears to match, but repayment amount and gateway amount differ.

Partial repayment mismatch

A borrower made a partial payment, but the internal repayment record or gateway report does not reflect the partial amount correctly.

Duplicate payment

The same borrower payment, repayment ID, order ID, payment ID, transaction ID, or gateway reference appears more than once.

Failed payment mismatch

A payment attempt failed in the gateway but is not updated correctly in the loan system.

Refund or reversal mismatch

A refund, duplicate payment reversal, failed refund, cancelled payment, chargeback, or gateway reversal appears on one side but is missing or recorded differently on the other.

Settlement mismatch

Gateway settlement amount does not agree with expected loan repayment value after gateway fees, refunds, chargebacks, and deductions.

Gateway fee mismatch

Gateway fees, processing charges, convenience fees, taxes, or service charges do not match expected values.

Timing difference

A borrower payment belongs to one period internally but appears in the payment gateway report, settlement report, bank statement, or accounting system in another period.

Wrong borrower allocation

A payment, refund, fee, reversal, or settlement is mapped to the wrong borrower, loan account, branch, product, entity, or business unit.

Missing or unclear reference

Loan ID, borrower ID, repayment ID, EMI ID, payment ID, order ID, gateway reference, transaction ID, UTR, or narration is missing, incomplete, or inconsistent.

Skipped record

A row cannot be reconciled because required data is missing, invalid, duplicate, incomplete, or unusable.

How this ready-made reconciliation works

Cointab pre-configures the workflow so your team does not need to rebuild the loan repayment and payment gateway reconciliation setup every period.

01

Select the template

Choose Loan Repayment vs Payment Gateway from popular reconciliations.

02

Select the period

Choose the day, week, month, quarter, due cycle, collection cycle, year, lifetime period, or custom period you want to reconcile.

03

Upload repayment and gateway reports

Upload the loan repayment or collection report, payment gateway transaction report, and any required settlement, failed payment, refund, reversal, EMI schedule, borrower master, bank, LMS, ERP, or supporting files.

04

Validate file format

Cointab checks whether the uploaded files match the expected structure and highlights missing or incorrect columns.

05

Run reconciliation

Cointab applies predefined data preparation and matching logic for loan repayment and payment gateway data.

06

Review output

View fully matched, partially matched, unmatched, and skipped records.

07

Download or automate

Download the Excel report, or automate future data input and output through email, SFTP, or APIs.

Structured matching first, AI assistance for difficult cases

Cointab applies structured reconciliation logic first, then uses AI to help with difficult open records where fixed rules are not enough.

Structured matching

Structured matching can use:

Loan IDLoan account numberApplication IDBorrower IDCustomer IDBorrower nameEMI IDInstallment numberRepayment IDCollection IDReceipt numberOrder IDPayment IDPayment gateway transaction IDGateway referenceGateway order referenceGateway settlement IDSettlement UTRBank UTRTransaction IDVoucher numberERP document numberBranch codeProduct codeLoan statusEMI statusRepayment statusGateway payment statusSettlement statusRefund statusReversal statusFailure reasonScheduled EMI amountPrincipal amountInterest amountPenalty amountCharge amountCollected amountGateway transaction amountGateway fee amountTax amountRefund amountReversal amountNet settlement amountNet received amountDue dateCollection dateGateway payment dateSettlement dateBank credit dateRefund dateReversal datePosting dateDerived or cleaned identifiers

Matching scenarios

  • One-to-one

    One loan repayment record matches one payment gateway transaction.

  • One-to-many

    One loan repayment maps to multiple payment attempts, split payments, gateway records, refunds, fees, or settlement entries.

  • Many-to-one

    Multiple loan repayments are grouped into one payment gateway settlement, payout batch, bank credit, or accounting entry.

  • Many-to-many

    Multiple loan repayment records, gateway transactions, refund records, fee records, and settlement entries are grouped and compared together.

  • Partial matching

    Identifiers match, but repayment amount, gateway amount, gateway fee, refund amount, settlement amount, or net received amount differs.

  • Status-level matching

    Repayment status, gateway payment status, refund status, settlement status, and bank status are compared together.

  • Settlement-level matching

    Gateway transactions, fees, taxes, refunds, chargebacks, deductions, settlement UTRs, net settlements, and bank credits are compared together where required.

  • EMI-level matching

    Installment-wise due amount, paid amount, principal, interest, penalty, repayment status, and gateway payment status are compared where available.

  • Net and contra matching

    Repayments, failed payments, duplicate payments, refunds, reversals, gateway fees, taxes, chargebacks, settlement deductions, and adjustment entries are netted where required.

AI-assisted transaction matching

After structured rules run, AI helps match difficult open transactions where:

  • References are incomplete
  • Payment IDs or order IDs are missing
  • Loan IDs are formatted differently across systems
  • Borrower names are written differently
  • Gateway references appear in different fields
  • One borrower payment is split across multiple gateway transactions
  • One gateway settlement contains multiple loan repayments
  • A failed payment is retried under a new payment reference
  • A refund is not clearly linked to the original repayment
  • Gateway fee or tax descriptions are inconsistent
  • Amounts require contextual review
  • Multiple possible matches exist

AI exception analysis

For transactions that remain open, AI can help identify possible reasons such as:

Repayment missing in gatewayGateway payment missing internallyRepayment marked paid but gateway failedGateway successful but repayment not updatedPartial payment differenceDuplicate paymentFailed payment not updatedRefund mismatchReversal mismatchGateway fee differenceSettlement timing differenceWrong borrower allocationPosting period differenceInternal loan system issueGateway processing issueUnclear reference

AI assists matching and exception review, but Cointab keeps reconciliation transparent, reviewable, and audit-friendly.

Audit-ready loan repayment and payment gateway reconciliation reports

Cointab gives your team a clear report showing which loan repayment, payment gateway, refund, reversal, fee, settlement, and bank records matched, partially matched, remained unmatched, or were skipped.

Report categories

  • Fully matched

    Loan repayment and payment gateway records where identifiers, statuses, and amounts match.

  • Partially matched

    Records where identifiers match but repayment amount, gateway amount, refund amount, fee amount, settlement amount, or status differs.

  • Unmatched in repayment records

    Payment gateway transactions that do not clearly match internal loan repayment records.

  • Unmatched in payment gateway

    Loan repayment records that do not clearly match payment gateway transactions.

  • Status differences

    Records where repayment status and gateway payment status do not agree.

  • Failed payment differences

    Records where failed, pending, cancelled, retried, or reversed payment statuses require review.

  • Refund and reversal differences

    Records where borrower refunds, duplicate payment reversals, gateway reversals, chargebacks, or failed refunds require review.

  • Fee and deduction differences

    Records where gateway fees, taxes, convenience fees, processing charges, chargebacks, or settlement deductions require review.

  • Settlement differences

    Records where settlement ID, settlement UTR, payout date, net settlement amount, or bank credit requires review.

  • EMI-level differences

    Records where EMI schedule, paid amount, principal, interest, penalty, and repayment status require review.

  • Skipped

    Records excluded due to missing, invalid, duplicate, incomplete, or unusable data.

Report capabilities

  • Summary cards
  • Transaction-level details
  • Loan-level filters
  • Borrower-level filters
  • Gateway-level filters
  • Payment status filters
  • Settlement filters
  • Difference amounts
  • Matched transaction drill-down
  • Manual match
  • Undo manual match
  • Excel export
  • Audit-friendly output

Automate recurring loan repayment and payment gateway reconciliation

Once this workflow is stable, Cointab can automate file input, reconciliation runs, and output delivery.

1

Bring data into Cointab

Data can be received or pulled through:

EmailSFTPAPI integrations, where available
2

Run automatically

Schedule reconciliation:

DailyWeeklyMonthlyEnd of dayAt month-end closeAfter loan repayment report exportAfter payment gateway file receiptAfter settlement file receiptAfter refund file receiptAfter bank statement receiptAfter all required files are availableAt a custom frequency
3

Push output back

Send reconciliation output to:

Loan management systemERPAccounting systemCollection operations dashboardPayment operations dashboardLending operations dashboardRisk or compliance dashboardBI dashboardInternal finance systemAnalytics databaseData warehouseInternal exception trackerBorrower follow-up workflowPayment gateway follow-up workflowAccounting close workflowAudit or compliance system
  • Matched loan repayments
  • Matched payment gateway transactions
  • Matched settlement records
  • Unmatched loan repayment records
  • Unmatched gateway transactions
  • Gateway successful but repayment not updated records
  • Repayment marked paid but gateway failed records
  • Failed payment records
  • Duplicate payment records
  • Refund differences
  • Reversal differences
  • Gateway fee differences
  • Settlement differences
  • Wrong borrower allocation records
  • Timing differences
  • Open items
  • Suggested actions
  • Excel reconciliation report
  • Structured API output

View a loan repayment and payment gateway demo report

See how Cointab presents Loan Repayment vs Payment Gateway output with matched, partially matched, unmatched, and skipped records.

Loan Repayment vs Payment Gateway Demo

Explore a sample report showing loan repayment records, payment gateway transactions, borrower details, payment IDs, successful payments, failed payments, refunds, reversals, gateway fees, settlement differences, and open items.

View demo report
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Explore related lending, payment, and bank reconciliations

Cointab supports other lending, repayment, EMI, disbursement, collection, payment gateway, NACH, bank, books, ERP, and finance reconciliation workflows.

Loan Repayment vs Bank

Reconcile borrower repayment records with bank statement credits across EMI payments, partial payments, failed payments, reversals, and open items.

View template

LMS vs Payment Gateway

Reconcile loan management system records with payment gateway reports across EMI collections, failed payments, refunds, fees, and settlements.

View template

EMI Schedule vs Collections

Reconcile scheduled EMI dues with actual borrower collections across paid, partially paid, overdue, waived, and reversed EMIs.

View template

LMS vs NACH

Reconcile LMS repayment records with NACH reports across mandate debits, successful collections, bounces, rejections, reversals, and charges.

View template

Payment Gateway Settlement vs Bank

Reconcile payment gateway settlements with bank statement credits.

View template

Bank Statement vs Books

Compare bank statement entries with accounting or books records.

View template

Built for teams reconciling loan repayments with payment gateway data

This template is useful for teams that regularly reconcile loan repayments, EMI payments, payment gateway transactions, failed payments, refunds, gateway fees, settlements, and open items.

NBFCs

For NBFCs reconciling loan repayment records with payment gateway transactions, settlement files, failed payments, and borrower payment status.

Digital lending platforms

For lending platforms reconciling borrower payments, EMI collections, payment gateway files, refunds, reversals, fees, settlements, and loan system updates.

Fintech lenders

For fintech companies managing high-volume loan repayments through payment gateways, payment links, UPI, cards, net banking, and online collections.

Banks

For banking teams reconciling loan repayment transactions, payment gateway collections, borrower accounts, internal loan systems, and accounting postings.

Microfinance companies

For microfinance teams reconciling borrower repayments, digital collection records, payment gateway reports, loan accounts, and repayment data.

Collection teams

For teams reviewing successful payments, failed collections, partial repayments, duplicate payments, borrower references, and payment gateway exceptions.

Finance teams

For teams preparing recurring loan repayment and payment gateway reconciliation reports for daily review, month-end close, reporting, and audit.

Payment operations teams

For teams managing gateway transactions, refunds, failed payments, settlements, fees, and gateway follow-ups.

Accounting teams

For teams reconciling loan receivables, interest income, bank settlements, gateway fees, refunds, reversals, and accounting postings.

Controllers

For controllers who need visibility into successful gateway payments not posted, failed payment mismatches, fee differences, refund differences, and settlement gaps.

CFOs

For finance leaders who want stronger control over lending collections, gateway settlement accuracy, repayment visibility, accounting accuracy, and audit readiness.

Accounting firms

For CA, CPA, or outsourced accounting teams handling lending, NBFC, fintech, payment gateway, and loan repayment reconciliation for multiple clients.

Trusted by teams handling loan repayment and payment gateway reconciliation

Cointab is used by finance and operations teams that reconcile high-volume, multi-source transaction data across loan repayments, payment gateways, banks, borrower records, loan management systems, books, ERP systems, partner reports, and internal systems.

  • Ixigo logo
  • Abhibus logo
  • Confirmtkt logo
  • Keventers logo
  • Lotus Herbals logo
  • The Belgian Waffle Co logo
  • PharmEasy logo
  • FormulaRX logo
  • Borosil logo
  • Croma logo
  • Checkers logo
  • Charleys logo
  • Ascott logo
  • FoxTale logo
  • Newtap logo
  • Vibgyor School logo
  • Gameskraft logo
  • Recode Studios logo
  • Bonkers Corner logo

“We have worked on many softwares but we love the ease of using cointab. The staff and support is very instant. They are approachable, proficient and patient. Team is very cooperative with the customisations. The experience of using cointab was nice.”

— Urbanic

Loan Repayment vs Payment Gateway FAQs

Loan Repayment vs Payment Gateway reconciliation is the process of comparing loan repayment or collection records with payment gateway transaction reports to identify matched payments, missing internal records, missing gateway records, failed payments, refunds, reversals, fee differences, settlement differences, and open items.

The main files are usually the loan repayment or collection report and payment gateway transaction report. Depending on the workflow, settlement reports, failed payment reports, refund reports, borrower master files, EMI schedule reports, bank statements, LMS exports, ERP exports, or supporting data files may also be used.

Yes. Cointab can show successful payment gateway transactions that do not clearly match internal loan repayment records.

Yes. Loan repayment records that do not clearly match payment gateway transactions can be shown separately for review.

Yes. Cointab can compare internal repayment status with payment gateway status to identify cases where the internal system shows paid but the gateway shows failed, pending, cancelled, or reversed.

Yes. Gateway successful transactions can be flagged where the internal loan system still shows unpaid, overdue, pending, or partially paid.

Yes. Partial payments, short payments, excess payments, split payments, and grouped payments can be compared where the data is available.

Yes. Borrower refunds, duplicate payment reversals, gateway reversals, failed refunds, chargebacks, and cancelled payments can be included where the required data is available.

Yes. Gateway fees, convenience fees, processing charges, taxes, service charges, and settlement deductions can be compared where the data is available.

Yes. Settlement reports and bank statements can be added to trace gateway transactions from borrower repayments to settlement and actual bank credits.

Yes. EMI-level reconciliation can be done using loan IDs, borrower IDs, EMI IDs, installment numbers, due dates, collected amounts, principal, interest, penalties, and payment references.

Yes. Once this template is selected and the workflow is used, the same setup can be reused for daily, weekly, monthly, due-cycle, collection-cycle, or custom reconciliation periods.

Yes. Once configured, Cointab can receive or pull required reports through email, SFTP, or APIs where available, run reconciliation automatically, and push output back to downstream systems.

Cointab validates uploaded files against the expected format. If the file format is different, users can correct the file, update the workflow, or create a custom reconciliation.

Yes. AI can help match difficult open records, review messy references, analyze exceptions, create derived columns, and suggest possible reasons and next actions.

Yes. Users can manually match records that the system and AI could not confidently match, and undo manual matches if needed.

Yes. Users can download Excel reports with fully matched, partially matched, unmatched, skipped, borrower-level, loan-level, gateway-level, settlement-level, and transaction-level details.

Start Loan Repayment vs Payment Gateway Reconciliation

Use Cointab's ready-made loan repayment and payment gateway reconciliation workflow to match borrower repayments, EMI collections, gateway transactions, failed payments, refunds, fees, settlements, review exceptions, and export audit-ready reports.

Start this reconciliationSchedule guided setup
View demo report→

Ready-made workflow · Reusable every period · Manual upload and automation supported

CointabCointab

Reconciliation automation for finance teams. Match sales, payments, marketplaces, banks, and partner reports with reusable workflows and audit-ready reports.

Product

  • Reconciliation automation
  • Popular reconciliations
  • Data automation
  • Reconciliation reports
Explore product
Solutions
  • Payment gateway
  • Marketplace
  • Bank reconciliation
  • COD reconciliation
All solutions
Popular
  • Sales vs payment gateway
  • Amazon MTR vs disbursement
  • Flipkart sales vs settlement
  • Bank statement vs books
All templates

Resources

  • Blog
  • Guides
  • FAQs
Resources hub

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Schedule guided setup

© 2026 Cointab. All rights reserved.

Privacy policy·Terms of service