CointabCointab
Product
Solutions
Popular reconciliations
PricingResources
Schedule guided setupLogin
Start free

Popular reconciliation template

Due To vs Due From Reconciliation

Reconcile Due To and Due From balances across entities, branches, group companies, related parties, ledgers, invoices, payments, advances, debit notes, credit notes, journals, taxes, and open items in one structured workflow.

Upload the Due To ledger, Due From ledger, intercompany supporting reports, and accounting data, select the period, run reconciliation, and review fully matched, partially matched, unmatched, timing-difference, balance-difference, and skipped records.

Start this reconciliationSchedule guided setup
View demo report

Ready-made workflow · Reusable every period · Manual upload or automated data flow

Due To Ledger
Due From Ledger
Intercompany Supporting Data
ERP / Accounting Data

Cointab Due To-Due From Reconciliation

MatchedPartially MatchedTiming DifferenceBalance DifferenceUnmatchedSkipped

Reconcile Due To and Due From balances across entities

Due To and Due From accounts should mirror each other across related entities, branches, departments, or group companies. In practice, timing differences, missing entries, incorrect references, manual journals, taxes, currency differences, and wrong allocations often create unreconciled balances.

The Due To vs Due From Reconciliation template helps finance, accounting, controllership, shared services, consolidation, and audit teams compare amounts payable by one entity with amounts receivable by another entity.

This helps teams answer questions such as:

  • Which Due To entries correctly match Due From entries?
  • Which Due To entries are missing from the corresponding Due From ledger?
  • Which Due From entries are missing from the corresponding Due To ledger?
  • Which intercompany invoices, payments, advances, reimbursements, allocations, debit notes, credit notes, and journal entries match correctly?
  • Which balances differ because of timing, tax, withholding, exchange rate, rounding, bank charges, or accounting treatment?
  • Which balances are true open items and which are only timing differences?
  • Which Due To / Due From balances should be cleared, adjusted, reclassified, written back, or carried forward?
  • Which entries need entity follow-up, branch follow-up, intercompany adjustment, journal correction, approval, or audit review?

This template is useful for multi-entity companies, group companies, holding-subsidiary structures, branch networks, shared service centers, finance teams, controllers, CFOs, auditors, and accounting firms that need a repeatable Due To and Due From reconciliation process.

Required files for this template

Cointab's ready-made workflow is designed around Due To ledgers, Due From ledgers, intercompany ledgers, branch ledgers, related-party ledgers, ERP exports, journal reports, payment reports, invoice registers, debit note files, credit note files, bank statements, and supporting finance data.

Data sourceExample records
Due To LedgerUsed as the payable-side source containing entity names, related-party accounts, voucher numbers, transaction dates, posting dates, document numbers, descriptions, debit amounts, credit amounts, balances, currencies, tax values, and accounting status.
Due From LedgerUsed as the receivable-side source containing corresponding receivable entries, invoices, payments, advances, reimbursements, debit notes, credit notes, journal postings, balances, references, currencies, and accounting status.
Intercompany Invoice RegisterOptional, but useful where invoice numbers, invoice dates, entity names, tax values, invoice amounts, document references, and posting references need to be compared with Due To and Due From ledgers.
Debit Note / Credit Note RegisterOptional, but useful where debit notes, credit notes, reversals, cost allocations, recoveries, corrections, write-backs, and intercompany adjustments need to be matched.
Journal Voucher ReportOptional, but useful where manual journals, accruals, provisions, reversals, reclassifications, eliminations, and consolidation entries affect Due To and Due From balances.
Payment / Receipt ReportOptional, but useful where intercompany payments, receipts, settlements, reimbursements, advances, repayments, fund transfers, and clearing entries need to be compared.
Bank StatementOptional, but useful where Due To / Due From settlements need to be traced to actual bank debits, bank credits, UTRs, and bank references.
Foreign Currency / Exchange Rate FileOptional, but useful where Due To and Due From balances are maintained in different currencies or where exchange gain/loss and revaluation differences need to be analyzed.
Tax / Withholding ReportOptional, but useful where GST, VAT, TDS, withholding tax, service tax, tax reversal, input/output tax, or other statutory values affect intercompany balances.
ERP / Accounting ExportOptional, but useful if Due To and Due From records are maintained in SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics, Tally, Zoho Books, QuickBooks, or another accounting system.
Supporting DataOptional supporting files can be used for entity mapping, branch mapping, related-party mapping, cost center mapping, GL mapping, document mapping, invoice mapping, tax mapping, currency mapping, project mapping, department mapping, or other enrichment.

What Cointab matches in Due To vs Due From reconciliation

Cointab compares Due To and Due From records across document references, debit-credit values, dates, balances, currencies, taxes, payments, journals, and open items.

Due To and Due From entries

Match payable-side Due To entries with corresponding receivable-side Due From entries.

Entity and related-party references

Compare entity codes, company codes, branch codes, related-party names, intercompany account codes, customer/vendor references, and mapped party names.

Document references

Compare invoice numbers, voucher numbers, journal voucher numbers, debit note numbers, credit note numbers, payment references, receipt references, bank references, UTRs, and ERP document numbers.

Debit and credit values

Compare debit amounts in one ledger with corresponding credit amounts in the other ledger, and vice versa.

Intercompany invoices

Match intercompany invoices, recharge invoices, expense allocations, management fees, service charges, transfer entries, branch allocations, and internal billing entries.

Debit notes and credit notes

Compare debit notes, credit notes, corrections, reversals, recoveries, write-backs, intercompany adjustments, and settlement adjustments.

Payments and receipts

Match payments recorded by one entity with receipts recorded by the other entity, including bank transfers, advances, settlements, reimbursements, and clearing entries.

Advances and recoveries

Compare intercompany advances, funding entries, recoveries, repayments, employee recharge entries, branch funding, and cross-entity settlements.

Journal entries

Compare manual journals, accruals, provisions, reversals, reclassifications, eliminations, and consolidation entries.

Balances

Compare opening balances, period movements, closing balances, entity-wise balances, GL-wise balances, branch-wise balances, and currency-wise balances.

Dates and timing

Compare transaction date, document date, invoice date, posting date, payment date, bank date, settlement date, and accounting period.

Currency and exchange differences

Compare transaction currency, base currency, exchange rate, converted amount, exchange gain/loss, and revaluation difference where available.

Taxes and statutory values

Compare GST, VAT, service tax, TDS, withholding tax, tax reversal, input tax, output tax, taxable value, and statutory deductions where applicable.

Accounting classifications

Compare GL account, ledger account, cost center, branch, entity code, project code, department, business unit, narration, and accounting treatment.

Common Due To vs Due From reconciliation exceptions

Cointab helps finance teams focus on unresolved balance differences instead of manually reviewing every intercompany invoice, payment, debit note, credit note, journal, tax entry, and ledger movement.

Due To entry not found in Due From

A payable-side entry appears in the Due To ledger, but no matching receivable-side entry is found in the Due From ledger.

Due From entry not found in Due To

A receivable-side entry appears in the Due From ledger, but no matching payable-side entry is found in the Due To ledger.

Debit-credit mismatch

A debit entry in one ledger does not match the corresponding credit entry in the other ledger.

Amount mismatch

Document references match, but transaction amounts differ.

Balance mismatch

Opening balance, period movement, or closing balance does not agree between Due To and Due From ledgers.

Invoice mismatch

An intercompany invoice exists on one side but is missing, duplicated, reversed, or recorded differently on the other side.

Debit note mismatch

A debit note is recorded in one ledger but missing or incorrectly recorded in the corresponding ledger.

Credit note mismatch

A credit note is recorded in one ledger but missing or incorrectly recorded in the corresponding ledger.

Payment mismatch

A payment recorded by one entity does not match the receipt or settlement entry recorded by the other entity.

Advance mismatch

An advance, prepayment, funding transfer, or intercompany recovery is recorded differently across both ledgers.

Journal mismatch

A manual journal, accrual, reversal, reclassification, provision, or elimination entry exists on one side but not the other.

Timing difference

A transaction is posted in one ledger during the selected period but appears in the corresponding ledger in another period.

Tax mismatch

GST, VAT, TDS, withholding tax, tax reversal, or statutory deduction differs across Due To and Due From records.

Currency mismatch

Transaction currency, exchange rate, converted amount, revaluation amount, or exchange gain/loss differs between both ledgers.

Rounding difference

Small differences exist because of decimal rounding, tax rounding, currency conversion, or system-level rounding.

Duplicate entry

The same invoice, payment, journal, debit note, credit note, voucher, or settlement entry appears more than once.

Wrong entity allocation

A transaction is mapped to the wrong entity, company, branch, department, related party, or business unit.

Wrong GL or cost center allocation

A transaction is posted to the wrong GL account, ledger account, cost center, project, department, or classification.

Narration mismatch

Both entries may relate to the same transaction, but descriptions or narrations are inconsistent.

Missing or unclear reference

Invoice number, voucher number, journal number, payment reference, entity code, related-party name, bank reference, or narration is missing, incomplete, or inconsistent.

Skipped record

A row cannot be reconciled because required data is missing, invalid, duplicate, incomplete, or unusable.

How this ready-made reconciliation works

Cointab pre-configures the workflow so your team does not need to rebuild Due To and Due From reconciliation every period.

01

Select the template

Choose Due To vs Due From Reconciliation from popular reconciliations.

02

Select the period

Choose the month, quarter, financial year, consolidation period, audit period, close period, lifetime period, or custom period you want to reconcile.

03

Upload Due To and Due From ledgers

Upload the Due To ledger, Due From ledger, and any required invoice register, debit note register, credit note register, journal report, payment report, bank statement, tax report, ERP export, currency file, or supporting data.

04

Validate file format

Cointab checks whether the uploaded files match the expected structure and highlights missing or incorrect columns.

05

Run reconciliation

Cointab applies predefined data preparation and matching logic for document references, debit-credit values, invoices, payments, journals, debit notes, credit notes, taxes, currencies, balances, and accounting classifications.

06

Review output

View fully matched, partially matched, unmatched, timing-difference, balance-difference, duplicate, and skipped records.

07

Download or automate

Download the Excel report, or automate future data input and output through email, SFTP, or APIs.

Structured matching first, AI assistance for difficult cases

Cointab applies structured reconciliation logic first, then uses AI to help with difficult open records where fixed rules are not enough.

Structured matching

Structured matching can use:

Due To account codeDue From account codeEntity codeCompany codeBranch codeRelated-party codeIntercompany account codeGL accountLedger accountCost centerProject codeDepartmentBusiness unitVoucher numberDocument numberERP document numberInvoice numberDebit note numberCredit note numberJournal voucher numberPayment referenceReceipt referenceBank referenceUTRTransaction IDNarrationDescriptionParty nameRelated-party nameDocument typeTransaction typeDebit amountCredit amountNet amountOpening balancePeriod debitPeriod creditPeriod movementClosing balanceTaxable valueGST amountVAT amountTDS amountWithholding tax amountTax reversal amountBase currency amountForeign currency amountExchange rateExchange gain/loss amountRevaluation amountRounding differenceTransaction dateDocument dateInvoice datePosting datePayment dateBank dateSettlement dateAccounting periodClearing statusApproval statusReversal statusDerived or cleaned identifiers

Matching scenarios

  • One-to-one

    One Due To entry matches one corresponding Due From entry.

  • One-to-many

    One Due To entry maps to multiple Due From entries, such as invoice plus tax lines, payment plus bank charges, or one journal split across multiple GL lines.

  • Many-to-one

    Multiple Due To entries are grouped and matched against one Due From entry, such as multiple invoices settled through one payment.

  • Many-to-many

    Multiple invoices, payments, debit notes, credit notes, journals, tax lines, advances, and settlement entries across both ledgers are grouped and compared together.

  • Partial matching

    References match, but amount, date, tax value, currency, GL account, related-party mapping, or status differs.

  • Debit-credit matching

    Debit entries in one entity are compared with corresponding credit entries in the other entity.

  • Balance-level matching

    Opening balances, period debits, period credits, period movement, and closing balances are compared entity-wise, GL-wise, branch-wise, or currency-wise.

  • Timing-difference matching

    Transactions posted in different periods are identified and separated from unresolved differences.

  • Entity and branch matching

    Transactions are grouped and compared by entity, branch, company code, related-party code, cost center, or business unit.

  • Currency matching

    Foreign currency amount, base currency amount, exchange rate, revaluation amount, and exchange differences are compared where applicable.

  • Tax-level matching

    Taxable values, tax amounts, withholding, deductions, reversals, and statutory fields are compared where available.

  • Net and contra matching

    Invoices, payments, debit notes, credit notes, advances, reimbursements, recoveries, journal adjustments, reversals, write-backs, and balances are netted where required.

AI-assisted transaction matching

After structured rules run, AI helps match difficult open transactions where:

  • References are incomplete
  • Voucher numbers are formatted differently
  • Invoice numbers are written differently across ledgers
  • Narrations are inconsistent
  • Entity names are abbreviated or spelled differently
  • Related-party names do not match exactly
  • One ledger uses debit/credit signs differently
  • One transaction is split into multiple lines
  • Multiple small entries match one larger balance
  • Tax and base amount are posted separately
  • Bank references are missing
  • Journal entries use different descriptions
  • Currency differences require context
  • Amounts require business interpretation
  • Multiple possible matches exist

AI exception analysis

For transactions that remain open, AI can help identify possible reasons such as:

Due To entry missing in Due FromDue From entry missing in Due ToDebit-credit mismatchAmount mismatchBalance mismatchInvoice mismatchDebit note mismatchCredit note mismatchPayment mismatchAdvance mismatchJournal mismatchTiming differenceTax mismatchCurrency mismatchRounding differenceDuplicate entryWrong entity allocationWrong branch allocationWrong GL allocationWrong cost center allocationPosting period differenceNarration mismatchInternal ERP issueIntercompany posting issueUnclear reference

AI assists matching and exception review, but Cointab keeps reconciliation transparent, reviewable, and audit-friendly.

Audit-ready Due To vs Due From reconciliation reports

Cointab gives your team a clear report showing which Due To and Due From records matched, partially matched, remained unmatched, were timing differences, had balance differences, or were skipped.

Report categories

  • Fully matched

    Transactions where Due To and Due From records match by reference, debit-credit value, amount, date, and status.

  • Partially matched

    Records where references match but amount, date, tax, currency, GL account, entity mapping, or posting status differs.

  • Unmatched in Due To

    Due From records that do not clearly match Due To ledger entries.

  • Unmatched in Due From

    Due To records that do not clearly match Due From ledger entries.

  • Debit-credit differences

    Records where debit and credit treatment does not align across both ledgers.

  • Balance differences

    Records where opening balance, period movement, closing balance, or ledger total differs.

  • Timing differences

    Transactions posted in different periods across Due To and Due From accounts.

  • Invoice differences

    Intercompany invoice records that are missing, duplicated, reversed, or mismatched.

  • Debit note and credit note differences

    Debit notes, credit notes, reversals, and adjustment entries requiring review.

  • Payment and receipt differences

    Payments, receipts, advances, settlements, reimbursements, and clearing entries requiring review.

  • Journal differences

    Manual journals, accruals, provisions, reversals, eliminations, and reclassifications requiring review.

  • Tax differences

    GST, VAT, TDS, withholding, taxable value, and tax reversal differences requiring review.

  • Currency and exchange differences

    Foreign currency, exchange rate, converted amount, exchange gain/loss, revaluation, and rounding differences requiring review.

  • Accounting classification differences

    Wrong entity, branch, GL account, cost center, department, project, related party, or business unit allocation.

  • Skipped

    Records excluded due to missing, invalid, duplicate, incomplete, or unusable data.

Report capabilities

  • Summary cards
  • Entity-level filters
  • Related-party filters
  • Branch-level filters
  • GL-level filters
  • Cost center filters
  • Project filters
  • Document-level filters
  • Invoice filters
  • Payment filters
  • Journal filters
  • Tax filters
  • Currency filters
  • Difference amounts
  • Balance view
  • Open-item view
  • Timing-difference view
  • Matched transaction drill-down
  • Manual match
  • Undo manual match
  • Excel export
  • Audit-friendly output

Automate recurring Due To and Due From reconciliation

Once this workflow is stable, Cointab can automate file input, reconciliation runs, and output delivery.

1

Bring data into Cointab

Data can be received or pulled through:

EmailSFTPAPI integrations, where available
2

Run automatically

Schedule reconciliation:

MonthlyQuarterlyAt month-end closeAt quarter-end closeAt year-end closeBefore consolidationBefore auditAfter ERP ledger exportAfter intercompany invoice register exportAfter payment report exportAfter journal report exportAfter all required files are availableAt a custom frequency
3

Push output back

Send reconciliation output to:

ERPAccounting systemConsolidation systemFinance operations dashboardShared services dashboardIntercompany close dashboardControllership dashboardBI dashboardInternal finance systemAnalytics databaseData warehouseInternal exception trackerEntity follow-up workflowIntercompany adjustment workflowJournal correction workflowClose management workflowAudit or compliance system
  • Matched Due To / Due From entries
  • Matched intercompany invoices
  • Matched debit notes
  • Matched credit notes
  • Matched payments
  • Matched journals
  • Unmatched Due To records
  • Unmatched Due From records
  • Debit-credit differences
  • Balance differences
  • Timing differences
  • Currency differences
  • Tax differences
  • Duplicate entries
  • Wrong entity allocation records
  • Wrong branch allocation records
  • Wrong GL allocation records
  • Open items
  • Suggested actions
  • Excel reconciliation report
  • Structured API output

View a Due To vs Due From demo report

See how Cointab presents Due To and Due From reconciliation output with matched, partially matched, unmatched, timing-difference, balance-difference, and skipped records.

Due To vs Due From Reconciliation Demo

Explore a sample report showing intercompany invoices, payments, debit notes, credit notes, journals, advances, balances, tax differences, timing differences, currency differences, and open items.

View demo report
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Explore related intercompany and ledger reconciliations

Cointab supports other intercompany, entity, books, ledger, bank, vendor, customer, ERP, and finance reconciliation workflows.

Entity A Ledger vs Entity B Ledger

Reconcile one entity's ledger with another entity's ledger across intercompany invoices, payments, debit notes, credit notes, journals, balances, and open items.

View template

Intercompany Reconciliation

Reconcile intercompany transactions, invoices, debit notes, credit notes, payments, journals, and balances across entities.

View template

Books Reconciliation

Reconcile accounting books across ledgers, reports, ERP exports, bank records, invoices, payments, and open items.

View template

Bank Statement vs Books

Compare bank statement entries with accounting or books records.

View template

Vendor Ledger vs Vendor Statement

Reconcile vendor ledgers with vendor statements across invoices, payments, debit notes, credit notes, deductions, and open items.

View template

Customer Ledger vs Customer Statement

Reconcile customer ledgers with customer statements across invoices, receipts, credit notes, debit notes, deductions, and open items.

View template

Built for teams reconciling Due To and Due From balances

This template is useful for teams that regularly reconcile Due To accounts, Due From accounts, intercompany balances, related-party balances, branch balances, journal postings, payments, taxes, currencies, and open items.

Group companies

For groups reconciling Due To and Due From balances between parent, subsidiary, associate, branch, or related-party entities.

Holding and subsidiary structures

For teams comparing intercompany receivables, payables, recharges, advances, recoveries, funding entries, and closing balances.

Multi-entity businesses

For finance teams handling multiple legal entities, business units, cost centers, regions, departments, or branches.

Branch networks

For businesses reconciling head-office vs branch, branch vs branch, entity vs branch, and internal funding balances.

Shared service centers

For shared service teams preparing recurring Due To / Due From and intercompany reconciliation reports.

Finance teams

For teams reconciling related-party balances during month-end, quarter-end, year-end, consolidation, and audit.

Accounting teams

For teams matching intercompany invoices, payments, journals, debit notes, credit notes, tax entries, and balance movements.

Controllers

For controllers who need visibility into open intercompany items, timing differences, balance mismatches, wrong allocations, and posting issues.

CFOs

For finance leaders who want stronger control over intercompany balances, group reporting, consolidation readiness, audit readiness, and financial close accuracy.

Treasury teams

For teams reviewing intercompany settlements, advances, repayments, reimbursements, funding transfers, and bank movements.

Tax teams

For teams reviewing intercompany tax values, withholding, GST, VAT, related-party entries, and statutory deductions.

Auditors

For audit teams reviewing entity-wise balances, related-party confirmations, intercompany confirmations, open items, and supporting transaction trails.

Accounting firms

For CA, CPA, or outsourced accounting teams handling intercompany, multi-entity, branch, related-party, Due To / Due From, and books reconciliation for multiple clients.

Trusted by teams handling Due To and Due From reconciliation

Cointab is used by finance and operations teams that reconcile high-volume, multi-source transaction data across entities, ledgers, Due To accounts, Due From accounts, ERP systems, banks, invoices, payments, journals, books, and internal systems.

  • Ixigo logo
  • Abhibus logo
  • Confirmtkt logo
  • Keventers logo
  • Lotus Herbals logo
  • The Belgian Waffle Co logo
  • PharmEasy logo
  • FormulaRX logo
  • Borosil logo
  • Croma logo
  • Checkers logo
  • Charleys logo
  • Ascott logo
  • FoxTale logo
  • Newtap logo
  • Vibgyor School logo
  • Gameskraft logo
  • Recode Studios logo
  • Bonkers Corner logo

“We have worked on many softwares but we love the ease of using cointab. The staff and support is very instant. They are approachable, proficient and patient. Team is very cooperative with the customisations. The experience of using cointab was nice.”

— Urbanic

Due To vs Due From Reconciliation FAQs

Due To vs Due From reconciliation is the process of comparing payable-side and receivable-side intercompany balances to identify matched transactions, missing entries, debit-credit differences, timing differences, amount mismatches, balance differences, and open items.

The main files are the Due To ledger and Due From ledger. Depending on the workflow, intercompany invoice registers, debit note files, credit note files, journal reports, payment reports, bank statements, tax reports, ERP exports, currency files, or supporting data may also be used.

Yes. Cointab can compare Due To and Due From balances across entities, branches, related parties, GL accounts, and accounting periods.

Yes. Cointab can match intercompany invoices using invoice numbers, document numbers, voucher numbers, entity names, amounts, dates, and supporting references.

Yes. Debit notes, credit notes, reversals, corrections, recoveries, write-backs, and adjustment entries can be compared across Due To and Due From ledgers.

Yes. Payments in one ledger and receipts in the other ledger can be matched using payment references, UTRs, bank references, dates, amounts, and clearing entries.

Yes. Cointab can show entries that appear in Due To but not Due From, and entries that appear in Due From but not Due To.

Yes. Transactions posted in different periods across the two ledgers can be identified separately from unresolved open items.

Yes. Opening balances, period movements, debits, credits, and closing balances can be compared where the required data is available.

Yes. Cointab can compare debit entries in one ledger with corresponding credit entries in the other ledger, depending on the configured reconciliation logic.

Yes. Transaction currency, base currency, exchange rate, converted amount, exchange gain/loss, revaluation, and rounding differences can be compared where available.

Yes. GST, VAT, TDS, withholding tax, taxable value, tax reversal, input tax, output tax, and statutory deductions can be compared where data is available.

Yes. Journal vouchers, accruals, provisions, reversals, reclassifications, eliminations, and manual adjustments can be compared.

Yes. The same workflow can be used for head-office-to-branch, branch-to-branch, entity-to-branch, or branch-to-entity Due To and Due From reconciliation.

Yes. Due To and Due From reconciliation can support related-party balances, intercompany accounts, group company accounts, parent-subsidiary balances, and internal trading accounts.

Yes. Once this template is selected and the workflow is used, the same setup can be reused for monthly, quarterly, year-end, consolidation-period, audit-period, or custom reconciliation periods.

Yes. Once configured, Cointab can receive or pull required ledgers through email, SFTP, or APIs where available, run reconciliation automatically, and push output back to downstream systems.

Cointab validates uploaded files against the expected format. If the ledger formats are different, users can map fields, update the workflow, or create a custom reconciliation.

Yes. AI can help match difficult open records, review inconsistent narrations, analyze amount differences, create derived identifiers, and suggest possible reasons and next actions.

Yes. Users can manually match records that the system and AI could not confidently match, and undo manual matches if needed.

Yes. Users can download Excel reports with fully matched, partially matched, unmatched, timing-difference, balance-difference, skipped, document-level, ledger-level, entity-level, GL-level, and transaction-level details.

Start Due To vs Due From Reconciliation

Use Cointab's ready-made Due To and Due From reconciliation workflow to match intercompany invoices, debit notes, credit notes, payments, journals, advances, taxes, balances, currency differences, review exceptions, and export audit-ready reports.

Start this reconciliationSchedule guided setup
View demo report→

Ready-made workflow · Reusable every period · Manual upload and automation supported

CointabCointab

Reconciliation automation for finance teams. Match sales, payments, marketplaces, banks, and partner reports with reusable workflows and audit-ready reports.

Product

  • Reconciliation automation
  • Popular reconciliations
  • Data automation
  • Reconciliation reports
Explore product
Solutions
  • Payment gateway
  • Marketplace
  • Bank reconciliation
  • COD reconciliation
All solutions
Popular
  • Sales vs payment gateway
  • Amazon MTR vs disbursement
  • Flipkart sales vs settlement
  • Bank statement vs books
All templates

Resources

  • Blog
  • Guides
  • FAQs
Resources hub

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Schedule guided setup

© 2026 Cointab. All rights reserved.

Privacy policy·Terms of service